Consumer research on eating out
The aim of this research was to inform the development of the Agency’s approach to engaging with catering outlets, and the development of possible approaches by businesses, navigator Research,
on behalf of the Agency, conducted qualitative research to gather consumers’ views and attitudes on the choices they make when eating outside the home, and the role that healthy eating plays in
The research was conducted in 12 focus groups of 6-8 participants; together with additional ‘quali-hall’ interviews with 32 respondents recruited in town centres for an immediate interview of
15-30 minutes. Participants were recruited to be eating out at least 2-3 times a month, with many doing so more often. The sample included a broad representation of age, socio-economic group
and life-stage. Fieldwork was conducted in the South East, Midlands and North of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland in February 2007.
Main findings – The nature of choice when eating out was relatively complex. People’s decisions were based on a number of interlinking factors, the importance of which varied depending
on the eating out occasion. The principal drivers were price; location and time available; perceived food hygiene; atmosphere and ambience – with brand names often influencing people’s
perceptions of one of more of these factors.
Healthy eating out was also a consideration (although to a lesser degree), even if exercised in a relatively simplistic way.
‘Healthy eating’ in the context of eating out was often understood to mean ‘avoiding unhealthy eating’. It was also frequently used in a relative sense; to mean that a choice was healthier than
the immediately available alternatives. However, consumer responses to the term ‘healthy’ were much narrower, connoting asceticism and lack of taste and appeal.
Consumers felt they did not eat out frequently enough to be greatly concerned about the healthiness of their choices. However, it was clear that consumers underestimated the extent of their
eating out, with smaller meals, and snacks in particular, likely to be overlooked.
There were occasions when eating out was a treat and ‘normal rules’ could be allowed to lapse. In this context it was noted that an occasion can be a treat for many reasons that go beyond the
‘indulgence’ of the food consumed – such as a relaxing evening out with friends or simply a break in the working day.
There was a strong feeling that it was difficult to make healthy choices when eating out, and certainly that it was difficult to do so without compromising on factors such as cost, time and
convenience. Many participants believed that it would not be possible to eat out more healthily than they already did – which limited their attempts to do so.
Where consumers had actively sought to eat out more healthily this had often entailed switching outlets rather than choosing different menu options. The most widespread example was to cut down
on what consumers described as ‘fast food’, while some respondents simply ate out less.
Consumers felt that outlets could do more to help them make healthier choices, and that healthier choices should be presented in such a way that consumers did not need to ask or be seen to be
departing from the norm. Consumers would also welcome outlets providing more information, in a manner that fitted in with their perception of the outlet and the eating occasion, in order to
help them make healthier choices. The idea of outlets making changes to mainstream dishes, and not necessarily presenting them as healthier options, was particularly appealing.
Consumer research on eating out (pdf 225kb)